Plato’s Soul in the Church

How Greek Thought Came to Permeate Church Teaching

By Vin Sparks

So, who is this Plato guy and what does he have to do with the church?

Plato (428 – 347BC) was a Greek philosopher and mathematician and, given that he lived 400 years or so before Christ, he had nothing to do with the church. His writings, however, have had tremendous influence on Western thinking:

• Plato was an essential figure in the development of Western thought. Along with his teacher, Socrates, and his most famous student, Aristotle, he laid the foundations of Western philosophy and science.

• He founded the first institution of higher learning in the Western world

• His theory of forms launched a unique perspective on abstract objects

• His dialogs have been used to teach a range of subjects, including philosophy, logic, ethics, rhetoric, religion and mathematics.

• Alfred North Whitehead once noted that a generalization of European philosophy is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.

School of Athens by Raphael

School of Athens by Raphael

Plato’s writing also influenced the teaching of the early church in fundamental areas. One such subject is what the church believes and teaches regarding the state of the dead.

As we have seen from the post, The Soul of America, the biblical use of the word “soul” is interchangeable with the word “person” and that there is little indication that when the Bible speaks of the soul that it is referring to an abstract part of our being that is conscious and lives on after we die. The post also advanced the idea that the concept of an immortal soul has it’s origins exclusively in Greek Philosophy – and by that I mean Plato.

This led us to a question:

When did Greek thought infiltrate Christian teaching on the afterlife?Church Fathers

In the period of time following the age of the early church, the Church Fathers were faced with attacks on the new Christian religion from two sides: heresy and the intellectual reaction of paganism.

The first few hundred years of the Christian era was a time of the establishment of doctrine – the teachings of Christian theology. This body of teaching, called Patristic speculation, was organized and taught in response to the intellectual attack of the pagans and in order to counter the many false doctrines (heresies) that sprung up continuously all over the known Christian world at the time.

False teachings about the person of Christ, how a Christian should live and the nature of God abound – then and now. Just some of the false doctrines which the church fought during the early church era are listed below:

• Jewish Legalism – probably the first heresy with which the young church had to deal. This false doctrine taught that circumcision and the Law of Moses were still binding on Christians.

• Gnosticism – possibly the most dangerous heresy of the 2nd century Christian church, it taught that the world was created and ruled by a lesser deity called the demiurge and that Christ was an emissary of the remote supreme divine being. Wisdom and knowledge, or a “higher truth”, was gained only through divine revelation and known to only a certain few. Gnostics asserted that matter, the world and the flesh, is inherently evil and spirit, the non-material world, is inherently good – ideas that are all firmly entrenched in Plato
.
• Asceticism – is the belief in severe self-discipline, self-mortification and avoidance of all forms of indulgence, typically for religious reasons.

• Antinomianism – anti, “against”, and nomos, “law”, are the two root words from the Greek, “against the law”. This was a heresy that taught that there were no moral laws that God expected Christians to obey.

• Docetism – the belief that Christ’s body was not human but either a phantasm or made of real but celestial substance and therefore His sufferings were only apparent. This was an important part of Gnostic belief and had its roots in the belief that all matter was inherently evil.

The pagans, early on, didn’t pay a lot of attention to the religion of Christ. As a matter of fact, they scoffed at what seemed to them to be an absurd sect of Judaism which worshipped a dead-and-crucified God. But, as Christianity acquired greater influence and began to reach the higher classes the pagans sat up and took notice. The intellectual attacks began and the new religion had to defend itself.

The defense took the form of philosophical arguments advanced in an effort to be seen as legitimate in terms of the Greek philosophical concepts that permeated the world view of the day. These formulated doctrines, some of which are called Orthodox today, ended up assimilating ideas that originated with Greek writers such as Xenophon, Homer and, of course, Plato.

This assimilation was inevitable because many of the crafters of the defense “wore the mantle of the philosopher”. The Ante-Nicene Fathers, aka the Apologists, were heavily influenced by Greek thought. Higher education of the day consisted of schools of philosophy that taught the ideas of Plato. These men were highly educated, some even taught in these schools before their conversion.

Justin, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen, Athanasius and Augustine – ALL key architects of the defense against the pagans; ALL heavily influenced by Plato. The writings of these men were influenced by Greek philosophy so much, and the passionate embrace of “Christian-Platonism” was so enthusiastic that hundreds of years later, Socrates and Plato were frequently regarded as divinely inspired pre-Christian saints.

So, to sum it all up – at a time when the early church is finding its legs, it finds itself defending its religious beliefs against the attack of false teaching from within and Greek philosophy from without. These written defenses, called Apologies, form the basis of a significant part of Orthodox dogma today. But the writers, called the Apologists, argued for Christianity from the point of view of Greek philosophy and, in doing so, opened the door to the influence of pagan thought on Christian beliefs. One of the doctrinal tenets compromised was the biblical teaching on the state of the dead.

But, what about…

This entry was posted in C. Anthropology, What We Believe and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s